<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lo-Browsers:  Firefox still ahead of Konqueror</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sensorymetrics.com/2007/10/22/lo-browsers-firefox-still-ahead-of-konqueror/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sensorymetrics.com/2007/10/22/lo-browsers-firefox-still-ahead-of-konqueror/</link>
	<description>re-inventing the User eXperience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:01:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Around the Browsersphere #5</title>
		<link>http://sensorymetrics.com/2007/10/22/lo-browsers-firefox-still-ahead-of-konqueror/comment-page-1/#comment-33851</link>
		<dc:creator>Around the Browsersphere #5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sensorymetrics.com/2007/10/22/lo-browsers-firefox-still-ahead-of-konqueror/#comment-33851</guid>
		<description>[...] SensoryMetrics released the browser stats from its visitors and revealed that Konqueror was dead last in terms of usage.  A post the next day then lamented the omission of the browser in a speed test (via Web 3.0).      No Comments, Comment or Ping [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SensoryMetrics released the browser stats from its visitors and revealed that Konqueror was dead last in terms of usage.  A post the next day then lamented the omission of the browser in a speed test (via Web 3.0).      No Comments, Comment or Ping [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
